Pros, cons and future perspectives – three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease

Sebastian Góreczny; Gregor Krings; Ziyad Hijazi; Thomas Fagan; Darren Berman; Damien Kenny; Gareth Morgan

doi:10.5114/aic.2019.87688

eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338

Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej

Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures

Editorial System

Submit your Manuscript

Editorial Policies

Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

3/2019
vol. 15

Send email

Copy url:

abstract:

Review paper

Pros, cons and future perspectives – three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease

Sebastian Góreczny

^{1, 2}

,

Gregor Krings

³

,

Ziyad M. Hijazi

⁴

,

Thomas Fagan

⁵

,

Darren Berman

⁶

,

Damien Kenny

^{7, 8}

,

Gareth J. Morgan

²

Department of Cardiology, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital, Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
Department of Cardiology, Colorado Children’s Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA
Pediatric Heart Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine and Sidra Heart Center, Doha, Qatar
Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, USA
The Heart Center, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Our Ladies Children’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
the Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Adv Interv Cardiol 2019; 15, 3 (57): 263–273

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2019.87688

Online publish date: 2019/09/04

View full text Get citation

EndNote

Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero

AMA

Góreczny S, Krings G, Hijazi ZM, et al. Pros, cons and future perspectives – three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2019;15(3):263-273. doi:10.5114/aic.2019.87688.

APA

Góreczny, S., Krings, G., Hijazi, Z. M., Fagan, T., Berman, D.,  & Kenny, D. et al. (2019). Pros, cons and future perspectives – three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 15(3), 263-273. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2019.87688

Chicago

Góreczny, Sebastian, Gregor Krings, Ziyad M Hijazi, Thomas Fagan, Darren Berman, Damien Kenny,  and Gareth J Morgan. 2019. "Pros, cons and future perspectives – three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease". Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 15 (3): 263-273. doi:10.5114/aic.2019.87688.

Harvard

Góreczny, S., Krings, G., Hijazi, Z., Fagan, T., Berman, D., Kenny, D.,  and Morgan, G. (2019). Pros, cons and future perspectives – three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 15(3), pp.263-273. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2019.87688

MLA

Góreczny, Sebastian et al. "Pros, cons and future perspectives – three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease." Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, vol. 15, no. 3, 2019, pp. 263-273. doi:10.5114/aic.2019.87688.

Vancouver

Góreczny S, Krings G, Hijazi Z, Fagan T, Berman D, Kenny D et al. Pros, cons and future perspectives – three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2019;15(3):263-273. doi:10.5114/aic.2019.87688.

Step changes in angiographic imaging are not commonplace. Since the move from analogue to digital and flat detector plates, two-dimensional imaging technology has certainly evolved but not jumped forward. Of all the routine imaging techniques used in cardiology, angiography has been the last modality to embrace the third dimension. Although the development of rotational angiography was initially for the benefit of neuroimaging and fusion of cross sectional datasets was aimed at the treatment of descending aortic pathology, interventional physicians in congenital and structural cardiology have immersed themselves in this technology over the last 10 years. Like many disruptive technologies, its introduction has divided opinion. We aimed to explore the mindset of those in the field of interventional cardiology who are driving imaging forward. These structured interviews recorded during the 21st Pediatric and Adult Interventional Cardiac Symposium illustrate the challenges and sticking points as well as giving an insight into the direction of travel for three-dimensional imaging and fusion techniques. Covering a wide range of career development, seniority and experience, the interviewees in this article are probably responsible for the majority of the published literature on invasive three-dimensional imaging in congenital heart disease.

keywords:

Pros, cons and future perspectives – three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease

Sebastian Góreczny 1, 2 , Gregor Krings 3 , Ziyad M. Hijazi 4 , Thomas Fagan 5 , Darren Berman 6 , Damien Kenny 7, 8 , Gareth J. Morgan 2

cardiac imaging, fusion imaging, percutaneous treatment, congenital heart defects

Sebastian Góreczny

^{1, 2}

,

Gregor Krings

³

,

Ziyad M. Hijazi

⁴

,

Thomas Fagan

⁵

,

Darren Berman

⁶

,

Damien Kenny

^{7, 8}

,

Gareth J. Morgan

²