Advances in Rehabilitation
facebook
twitter
eISSN: 1734-4948
ISSN: 0860-6161
Advances in Rehabilitation
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original article

Effect of kinetic control training on pain and craniovertebral angle symptomatic forward head posture

Noura Metwally Khalifa
1
,
Adel Rashad Ahmed
1, 2
,
Eman Ahmed Embaby
1
,
Asmaa Hossam
1

  1. Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt
  2. Faculty of Physical Therapy, Lotus University. Egypt
Advances in Rehabilitation
Online publish date: 2025/09/19
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Introduction
Forward head posture (FHP) is a condition where the head shifts anteriorly in the cervical spine's sagittal plane, which affects the activation of the muscles encompassing the shoulder complex as well as scapular mechanics, leading to changes in force couples, tissue overuse, pain, weakness in the deep cervical flexors, and uncontrolled movement of the cervical and shoulder muscles.

Material and methods
Forty-two participants with symptomatic FHP, aged 18-40 years, were randomly distributed into two equal groups; in the control group (A), 21 participants received conventional physical therapy; in the experimental group (B), 21 participants underwent the same treatment as the control group plus kinetic control exercises (KC). Treatments were conducted three times weekly for four weeks. Craniovertebral angle (CVA) by Photographic Posture Analysis Method, pain severity by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), neck function by Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Deep Cervical Flexor Endurance (DCFE) by Craniocervical Flexion Test (CCFT) were evaluated pre- and post-study program.

Results
Post-intervention, comparisons between groups demonstrated a further significant improvement in NDI and DCFE in group B compared to group A (p < 0.05) across both groups.

Conclusions
KC is more effective in improving DCFE (motor control) and functional disability than conventional therapy. Both KC and conventional therapy demonstrated equal effectiveness in enhancing CVA and NPRS.

keywords:

forward head posture, kinetic control, deep cervical flexor endurance











Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.